Compliance laws, rules
and standards generally cover matters such as observing proper standards of
market conduct, managing conflicts of interest, treating customers fairly, and
ensuring the suitability of customer advice. They typically include specific
areas such as the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, and
may extend to tax laws that are relevant to the structuring of banking products
or customer advice.
The expression
“compliance risk” is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, material
financial loss, or loss to reputation a bank may suffer as a result of its
failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, related self-regulatory
organization standards, and codes of conduct applicable to its banking
activities (together, “compliance laws, rules and standards”).
A bank that knowingly
participates in transactions intended to be used by customers to avoid
regulatory or financial reporting requirements, evade tax liabilities or
facilitate illegal conduct will be exposing itself to significant compliance
risk.
Compliance laws, rules
and standards have various sources, including primary legislation, rules and
standards issued by legislators and supervisors, market conventions, codes of
practice promoted by industry associations, and internal codes of conduct
applicable to the staff members of the bank. For the reasons mentioned above,
these are likely to go beyond what is legally binding and embrace broader
standards of integrity and ethical conduct.
It is in such a scenario
that outsourced services of Compliance Monitoring & Reporting by companies
such as Archis Business Solutions Pvt Ltd gain significance. While
theoretically compliance should be part of the culture of the organization and
not just the responsibility of specialist compliance vendor or staff,
nevertheless, a bank will be able to manage its compliance risk more
effectively if it outsources the compliance function to a specialist
organization where the required structures are in place and the processes are
fine-tuned over time with the “compliance function principles”. Apart from the
obvious saving on manpower & training costs, with properly documented
division of responsibilities, the inherent risks are almost completely
mitigated!
No comments:
Post a Comment